 Valued Image links:
|
[edit] How to nominate an image or a set of images for VI status
Nominations will be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those criteria before submitting an image to help cut down on the number of candidates that have a low chance of success. Make sure you understand the concept of scope and how to choose the correct scope for your nomination. Please make sure that your proposed image fulfills all of the necessary criteria before nominating it. For example, if it needs to be geocoded, do that in advance. If no appropriate categories exist, create and link them beforehand. Although some reviewers may help by fixing minor issues during the review process, it is your responsibility as nominator to ensure your image ticks all the necessary boxes before you propose it. If you nominate an image that ignores one of the criteria, don't be surprised if it fails VI review.
[edit] Adding a new nomination (image)
Step 1: Copy the image name into this box (excluding the File: prefix), at the end of the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Valued image candidates/My-image-filename.jpg. Then click on the "Create new nomination" button.
Step 2: Follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save the resulting VIC subpage.
Step 3: Manually add the candidate image towards the end of Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list, (under the heading "New valued image nominations") as the last parameter in the VICs template: Click here, and append the following line as the last parameter of the relevant section:
- |My-image-filename.jpg
so that it looks like this
{{VICs
...
|My-image-filename.jpg
}}
and save the candidate list.
[edit] Adding a new nomination (set)
Step 1: Choose a set name, and type that into this box after the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Valued image candidates/Mysetname. Then click on the "Create new set nomination" button.
Step 2: Follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save the resulting VISC subpage.
Step 3: Open Commons:Valued image candidates/Set candidate list Click here, and add your set at at the bottom of the page using this format:
{{Commons:Valued image candidates/A vulca......
{{Commons:Valued image candidates/Mysetname}}
and save the set candidate list.
[edit] Renomination
Declined VICs and VISCs can be renominated by any registered user, but only after one or more of the root cause(s) leading to a decline has/have been addressed. Undecided VICs and VISCs can be renominated as is although it is still recommended to consider and fix issue(s) which may have hindered a promotion of the candidate in the previous review.
Besides fixing issues with the previous nomination the following procedure shall be followed upon renomination.
Step 1: Edit the candidate subpage you intend to renominate. All declined and undecided VICs and VISCs are placed in either Category:Declined valued image candidates, or Category:Undecided valued image candidates and sorted by the date of the previous nomination.
Step 2: Replace the previous nomination date and time by pasting in
|date={{subst:VI-time}}
Step 3: Replace the "undecided" or "declined" status with "nominated" (or "discussed" if you intend to add it to a Most Valued Review).
Step 4: If the previous nominator was a different user replace the nominator parameter with
|nominator=~~~
Step 5: If the candidate does not already have an archive link to previous reviews: Create one using the following procedure.
- Cut the text in the previous review section (leave the closing braces "}}")
- replace the review parameter with
|review=
{{subst:VIC-archive}}
}}
- Save the page.
- There is now a red link to Previous reviews. Click the link to create the archive subpage and paste in the previous reviews.
- Save the previous reviews archive page
Step 6: Add the candidate to the candidates list.
[edit] How to open a Most Valued Review
There must be at least two candidates competing within essentially the same scope to open an MVR. Each needs its own VIC subpage, which should be created as above if it does not already exist. Then, add the following section at the end of the page Commons:Valued image candidates/Most valued review candidate list:
=== Scope ==
{{VICs
|candidate1.jpg
|candidate2.jpg
}}
where candidate1.jpg and candidate2.jpg are the VIC subpages of the respective candidates. If need be, also remove the relevant image(s) from the list in Pending valued image candidates
If one of the candidates is an existing VI within essentially the same scope, the original VIC subpage is re-opened for voting by changing its status to status=discussed and new reviews are appended to the original VIC subpage. However, any original votes are not counted within the MVR.
Each candidate should have its status parameter set to discussed, while the MVR is ongoing.
[edit] How to review the candidates
[edit] How to review an image or a set of images
Any registered user can review the valued image candidates and the valued image set candidates. Comments are welcome from everyone, but neither the nominator nor the original image author may vote (that does not exclude voting from users who have edited the image with a view to improving it).
Nominations should be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those and the page on scope carefully before reviewing. Reviewing here is a serious business, and a reviewer who just breezes by to say "I like it!" is not adding anything of value. You need to spend the time to check the nomination against every one of the six VI criteria, and you also need to carry out searches to satisfy yourself on the "most valuable" criterion.
[edit] Review procedure
- On the review page the image or image set is presented in the review size. You are welcome to view the image in full resolution by following the image links, but bear in mind that it is the appearance of the image at review size which matters.
- Check the candidate carefully against each of the six VI criteria (and the set criteria if appropriate). The criteria are mandatory, and to succeed the candidate has to satisfy all six.
- Use the where used field, if provided, to study the current usage of the candidate in Wikimedia projects. If you find usage of interest do add relevant links to the nomination.
- Look for other images of the same kind of subject by following the links to relevant categories in the image page, and to any Commons galleries.
- If you find another image or set which is already a VI within essentially the same scope, the candidate and the existing VI should be moved to Most Valued Review (MVR) to determine which one is the more valued.
- If you find one or more other images/sets which in your opinion are equally or more valued images within essentially the same scope, you should nominate these images as well and move all the candidates to an MVR.
- Once you have made up your mind, edit the review page and add your vote or comment to the review parameter as follows:
| You type |
You get |
When |
| *{{Comment}} My Comment. -- ~~~~ |
* Comment My comment. -- Me |
You have a comment. |
| *{{Info}} My information. -- ~~~~ |
* Info My information. -- Me |
You have information. |
| *{{Neutral}} Reason for neutral vote. -- ~~~~ |
* Neutral Reason for neutral vote. -- Me |
You are uncertain or wish to record a neutral vote. |
| *{{Oppose}} Reason for opposing vote. -- ~~~~ |
* Oppose Reason for opposing vote. -- Me |
You think that the candidate fails one or more of the six mandatory criteria. |
| *{{Question}} My question. -- ~~~~ |
* Question My question. -- Me |
You have a question. |
| *{{Support}} Reason for supporting. -- ~~~~ |
* Support Reason for supporting. -- Me |
You think that the candidate meets all of the six mandatory criteria. |
- If the nomination fails one of the six criteria, but in a way that can be fixed, you can optionally let the nominator know what needs to be done using the {{VIF}} template.
- Your comment goes immediately before the final closing braces "}}" on the page.
- Finally, change the status of the nomination if appropriate:
status=nominated When no votes or only neutral votes have been added to the review field (blue image border).status=supported When there is at least one {{Support}} vote but no {{Oppose}} votes (light green image border).status=opposed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote but no {{Support}} votes (red image border).status=discussed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote and one {{Support}} vote (yellow image border).
Remember the criteria: 1. Most valuable 2. Suitable scope 3. Illustrates well 4. Fully described 5. Geocoded 6. Well categorized.
For sets, see also the Set criteria.
[edit] Changes in scope during the review period
The nominator is allowed to make changes in scope as the review proceeds, for example in response to reviewer votes or comments. Whenever a scope is changed the nominator should post a signed comment at the bottom of the review area using {{VIC-scope-change|old scope|new scope|--~~~~}}, and should also leave a note on the talk page of all existing voters asking them to reconsider their vote. A support vote made before the change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn.
|
Skip to image nominations
Comment My comment. -- 
Info My information. -- 
Neutral Reason for neutral vote. -- 
Oppose Reason for opposing vote. -- 
Question My question. -- 
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
Already established MVR. --
Support Very didactic --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:03, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit){kind=link}
