User talk:Docu

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
09:58 [update]
approx. 09:58 (or 21:58) displayed on clock/watch
Commons clock - made from this set [update]
  • For more talk, see page history.
  • For bot related questions, please use the bot's talk page.

I got this question and gave an anser, bur perhaps you have a second opinion. --Stunteltje (talk) 06:55, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Suur Tõll IMO categories

Hello,

Estonian museum icebreaker Category:Suur Tõll (ship, 1914) has two IMO categories, Category:IMO 6104574 and Category:IMO 8640351. You have created both IMO cats, but User:Docu has added the 6104574 number to Suur Tõll later: Revision of Category:Suur Tõll (ship, 1914). Do you know which IMO cat is correct? MKFI (talk) 11:02, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Cannot find information about a ship with Category:IMO 6104574 in Google. Equasis gives: "The Imo Ship number is not valid", so the checksum is not correct and something is wrong with that number. For IMO 8640351 gives Equasis: "No ship has been found with your criteria" so the checksum is correct. This number is also given in Shipspotting. So I assume this number is the correct one. Please realise the IMO number for ships was created after WW2, so it is special when a ship built in 1914 has an IMO number. I'll copy this discussion to User:Docu, as he might have had a special reason for the other number. --Stunteltje (talk) 06:55, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
When cleaning up Commons:Ships_by_IMO_number_only#Empty_categories, I came across it and added it to Category:Suur Tõll (ship, 1914) because the file description page was already created and I couldn't determine which one was correct. Please add {{speedy}} to the incorrect one. --  Docu  at 18:09, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Participate
Toolbox