User talk:Heb

Welcome to the Commons, Heb!

First steps tutorial Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}} For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Category move ?

Because Denmark is a small country, it was not appropriate to create a Denmark subcategory with a so special subject like Category:Military vessels/vehicles of Denmark. Therefore, I split that special category in several ones matching existing subjects in Commons (standardization allows easy browsing through the database). You'll find a list of available subjects in Category:Categories by country. --Juiced lemon 22:21, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions

Thanks for uploading your fine images. Have you considered releasing http://www.flickr.com/photos/hebster/1364348611/ as well? We don't have an image of Skaden yet and I think we only have a single image of a Flyvefisken-class vessel. Thanks again for your contributions. Valentinian ^{T / C} 23:40, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply. Btw, this is a great image of Absalon-class. Unfortunately, we still have to wait a few more years to see the new patrol vessels. Thanks again for your contributions. Valentinian ^{T / C} 21:24, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

Dine kategoriseringer af et helikopterbillede

Hej Hebster. jeg har beærket at du har tilføjet et par DK cats på dette billede. Jeg er tvivl om det er helt korrekt. Godt nok har Grønland et rigsfællesskab med Danmark, men at sige at det er "Rescue helicopters in Denmark" ved jeg ikke helt om er retvisende. Jeg ved ikke om det har været drøftet her på Commons, men det lader til at konventionen her er at billeder relaterende til Grønland kategoriseres i en "Grønlandsstruktur" sideordnet med kategoristrukturen for Danmark. Hvis man endelig vil kunne navigere til Grøndlandske kategorier fra DK sider, tor jeg en bedre metode er at have f.eks. Tildele billedet kategorin "Rescue helicopters in Greenland" og have den som en subcat til både "Helicopters in Greenland" og "Rescue Helicopters In Denmark". Har du nogen holdning til det? -- Slaunger 09:49, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Hej Slaunger. Jeg er principielt slet ikke uenig med dig. Det ideelle ville være at have en kategori der hed Rescue helicopters in Greenland, som der så var indgang til både via den overordnede kategori Aircraft of Greenland og Rescue helicopters in Denmark.

Men i og med at hverken Aircraft of Greenland eller Rescue helicopters in Greenland eksisterer, hører de efter min mening mest naturligt hjemme i det danske tilsvarende. På sigt skal kategorierne Aircraft of Greenland og Rescue helicopters in Greenland (og tilsvarende for Færøerne) såmænd nok blive oprettet, både som selvstændige kategorier og via det danske kategori-hieraki (idet de bærer OY-præfikset), men i første omgang fokuserer jeg på de "lokal-danske" skibe, køretøjer og fly. /Hebster 12:56, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Ok, men jeg er ikke sikker på at det giver mening helt at følge et parallelt kategori-hierarki for Grønland. Det er der simpelthen slet ikke materiale nok til. Der er trods alt kun 55000 indb i dette enorme land. jeg mener derfor en mere grovkornet kat struktur er relevant for Grønland. Den eksisterende Category:Helicopters of Greenland mener jeg faktisk er alt nok. Slaunger 19:59, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Jeg er tidligere blevet orienteret om at såfremt der findes en eksisterende struktur for UK/US bør man - så vidt muligt - følge den for øvrige lande også - uanset hvor basalt det måtte være. I mit tilfælde drejede det sig om at der var 5 billeder af fly/helikoptere, 8 af skibe og 4 af køretøjer fra forsvaret, som jeg så slog sammen til en gruppe. Det gør man så åbentbart ikke :) Hebster 21:12, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Hej igen hebster. Jeg prøvede at se mig lidt omkring efter retningslinier, men kunne ikke finde det. Da jeg ikke kan dokumentere hverken dit eller mit standpunkt med en reference til en politik eller instruks synes jeg blot vi skal lade det være. Ikke den store skade at der kommer et par ekstra kategorier på nogle få billeder... Hilsen -- Slaunger 21:21, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Hej igen igen :) Du har ret - der er ingen formaliserede retningslinjer vedr. fly (jeg har i hvert tilfælde heller ikke kunnet finde dem) som der er for f.eks. skibe, men der er Creating categories og Naming categories (der er et udkast) . Jeg vil slet ikke udelukket at jeg på et tidspunkt opretter Rescue helicopters in Greenland og Rescue helicopters on the Faroe Islands som underkategorier til h.h.v. Aircraft of Greenland og Aircraft of Faroe Islands men medmindre antallet af billeder derfra pludseligt eksploderer, bliver det ikke lige med det første :) MVH Hebster 21:52, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Image:P570 Knud Rasmussen.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 10:47, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Image:P547 Sehested.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 10:47, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Image:RDN LCP2 SRC90E.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 10:47, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Glædelig overraskelse

Hej Hebster.

Dette var en glædelig overraskelse og jeg glæder mig derudover til at komme ombord på dette skib, som jeg kan se du har leveret et billede af d. 22/10 i Nuuk. -- Slaunger (talk) 13:19, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Hej Slaunger. Dit fine billede passede simpelthen fint som et Selected Picture - også fordi det havde koordinater ;). Billedet af Knud Rasmussen har jeg nu ikke selv taget men blot fået "krattet op under neglende" med en passende licens. Jeg håber - på værnets vegne - at du får en god tur ombord :) MVH Hebster (talk) 13:53, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

IMO

Have a look at the IMO category for your Freja. Regards, --Stunteltje (talk) 10:20, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Heh. I was just writing on your talkpage about the shipinfo template. I'm not really sure what to think about the IMO-category concept. It is obvious that it makes it very easy to track ships though name- and flagstate-changes, but my concern is that it may "hide" certain information from people, whom aren't familar to the IMO numbering. One solution could be to either implement a "Ship specification is probably available at the IMO xxxxxxx category"-banner or to utilize both a template-kindda thinge. The latter is a poor solution, because it would require double entries so i think the former would be prefereble. On thoughts i think it makes quite a effecient and clean solution. Kind regards Hebster (talk) 10:50, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans | العربية | ‪Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‬ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | ‪Deutsch (Sie-Form)‬ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Српски / Srpski | Svenska | தமிழ் | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

---

Hello, Heb!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:53, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

• Image:Protective glove.jpg is uncategorized since 21 March 2009.
• Image:UBX-food.jpg was uncategorized on 24 February 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:45, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Category:Rigid-hulled inflatable boats

Hi! Category:Rigid-hulled inflatable boats already contains category:ETRACO, so there's no need to add on pictures representing an ETRACO. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 08:57, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

I'm aware of that. The reason for adding Category:Rigid-hulled inflatable boats to the two files in category:ETRACO, is that it isn't specified in the category description of category:ETRACO what ETRACO is or the relation between ETRACO and RHIB's and a google search didn't reveal much either. --Hebster (talk) 09:28, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

It's now fixed. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 13:38, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Template:Cc-by-2.0/lang‎

The answer on your question is here: base template. A cascade protection was removed because cascade protection is dangerous. I will protect the /lang and the /language versions, thanks for the pointer. --Martin H. (talk) 18:34, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

Question

Why did you remove the "current ministers of Denmark" category from Lene Espersen? [1]. Ysangkok (talk) 12:06, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

Because it is empty. The category description clearly specifies that only relevant photos and categories with content should be added to the category. This is in order to avoid confusion :o) --Henrik (Talk · Contributions · E-mail) 09:13, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

Der står i parantesen efter kategorierne til ministrene om der er noget i kategorien. Jeg mener at personernes kategori skal kategoriseres rigtigt, lige meget om der er indhold eller ej. Det kan man jo så se på tabellen om der er, hvilket jeg troede var formålet med den. Ellers kan man jo chekke parantesen. Det bør ikke være nødvendigt at ændre kategorien når der kommer billeder i kategorierne. Hvorfor har vi overhovedet personkategorierne hvis de ikke må være kategoriseret rigtigt? Det er jo forvirrende at vi har nogle kategorier på personkategorierne, men ikke minister-kategorien...

Desuden mener jeg linksne til personerne skal puttes tilbage. Hvis det er vigtigt at koden er præcis den samme på dansk Wikipedia og her, kan man jo eksplicit bruge "commons:" præfiket. Det virker også her selv om vi allerede er på Commons. På den måde ville det også virke på dansk Wikipedia. --Ysangkok (talk) 22:51, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Det giver ingen mening at have tomme kategorier. De forurener blot og kan altid blive oprettet når der er indhold til dem.

Det giver god mening at bruge :commons:-præfikset og det kan botte også håndtere. --Henrik (Talk · Contributions · E-mail) 19:43, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Edith Mærsk

Hi! One of your pictures was used on index.hu, one of the most popular news sites in Hungary. I'm not affiliated with them or anything, I just thought you would be interested, and I know I'm proud when one of my pictures pops up somewhere "on the interwebs" :) Bye Villy (talk) 19:19, 24 November 2009 (UTC) -- Thanks for the notice mate :o) --Henrik (Talk · Contributions · E-mail) 19:40, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

S-togs stationer

Hej Hebster. Jeg har fået et forslag om s-togs stationer, jf. User_talk:MGA73#Fusion_af_kategorier. Vil du kigge forbi? --MGA73 (talk) 17:51, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Tak for info; "jeg har været der". --Henrik (Talk · Contributions · E-mail) 19:40, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Files still awaiting OTRS confirmation

Hello, Hebster. The file(s) listed below have been marked with {{OTRS received}}, but there has been no complete confirmation of its permission status in the last 30 days. From what I'm able to tell, you were the person who added this template. Would you mind taking a look at this again? If confirmation cannot be found, this file should probably be marked for deletion. This should be the only notification you will receive regarding this image, so long as the comment I added to the image description page is not altered. Thanks! HersfoldOTRSBot^{(talk/opt out)} 09:17, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

If you are not an OTRS volunteer or did not add the "received" template to this file, it's possible I made a mistake identifying the correct user. I look for the most recent diff where the template was added, so if you reverted an edit where this template was removed, I can't tell the difference. If this is the case, please let my operator know at w:en:User talk:Hersfold. Sorry for the inconvenience!

The file(s) in question are:

• File:JohnDahlJun07.jpg
• File:TéaLeoniJun07.jpg

Template:PD-DenmarkEVH

Template deletion warning

Template:PD-DenmarkEVH has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

  Eusebius (talk) 09:55, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Military rank insignia of Denmark

As these files have sit in Category:Copyright violations for over a month, without any sysop willing to delete them, I declined speedy and opened a mass-request. Cheers, Jean-Fred (talk) 20:50, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

Permission to use your image

Hi Heb, I would like to use your photo of the Maersk container ship found at http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Edith_Maersk_Suez.jpg in a textbook. Please email me at mcispl@yahoo.com so I can give you more details. Thank you. ~ Marcav

File:Lifeguard flags.svg

Hate to be hypercritical, but it says "Svimming" at upper left... -- AnonMoos (talk) 15:48, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

Woups! Thanks, I've corrected the typo now :o). IKR Henrik (Talk · Contributions · E-mail) 16:13, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

File tagging File:G3-CTD.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:G3-CTD.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading not own work. Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Lycaon (talk) 08:47, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

File:DK-Navy-RLG2.png

[being technical] I declined the deletion on the grounds that you listed, though if you wish to pursue simply on the grounds of UPLOADER REQUEST, then that should be sufficient to deem the removal.  — billinghurst sDrewth 13:43, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Category:Church_buildings_in_Copenhagen

Category discussion notification

Category:Church_buildings_in_Copenhagen has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

NVO (talk) 19:41, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

TUSC token 5535b5a0e86975e0adc0e4fe507bf7fe

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Date of File:Danish air force R-771.jpg

Hi Heb,

Just curious, how did you determine that the picture was taken on August 4? --  Docu  at 09:52, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

I didn't. It was an most unfortunate error on my part (actually applied to several images). It has been fixed on all affected images now. Sorry for the inconvenience. --Henrik (heb: Talk · Contributions · E-mail) 09:59, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Thank you! Have a nice day :D

|EPO| ^da: 13:21, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

Thank you very much :o) --Henrik (heb: Talk · Contributions · E-mail) 13:30, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

2011 UCI Road WC photos

Hey there; I have seen your photos in the main cat, and you were looking for a few names for the photos, so I helped out and gave you a few for the files to be moved to. Hope you don't mind that! Some others may be close numerical-wise to the other photos, so here's the result list if you want to patch the other missing riders up! Regards, Cs-wolves(talk) 13:50, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

That is so great! I'll get on with moving them right away. Thank you so much :o). In kind regards 14:02, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

You're most welcome! Cs-wolves(talk) 14:09, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Kattegatforbindelse 2007.svg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 14:21, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

User:Hebster/Shipinfo

Heb, I have replaced "User:Hebster/Shipinfo" with {{Ship}} in all categories. It is clearer to use template that are in the template namespace rather than in the user namespace. I integrated every parameter of User:Hebster/Shipinfo that was in use, but not those that were not used, because with translations and formatting, the template is becoming quiet complex, but they can be added if necessary. I hope it is fine for you, else just let me know.:)--Zolo (talk) 10:04, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

Category:S-train stations in Denmark

 

Category discussion notification

Category:S-train stations in Denmark has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

og Category:S-train stations in Copenhagen --MGA73 (talk) 16:18, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

OTRS

Hi Heb, I gave my answer on http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard#Henk_Obee_.28talk.C2.A0.C2.B7_contribs.29 Henk Obee 14:08, 31 January 2012 (UTC)