User talk:Hekerui

Archives 1

Expecting a comment here. Regards--Vssun (talk) 14:26, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

Phil Scott, Vermont Lt. Governor

Please don't delete the image. As you can see, I verified that it is not under copyright. It appears in the Vermont Legislative Directory for 2011-2012, which is not copyrighted.

Regards,

Billmckern (talk) 00:55, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

World homosexuality map

You are a frequent editor on this map. I wonder if you know where the source for all the other states were found so we can update Illinois. Thanks, --Haha169 (talk) 18:31, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

I merely fixed something there so I can only assume the creator used LGBT rights by country or territory to create the map. Hekerui (talk) 20:36, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Sorry, I meant the source for the U.S. states that were used to create the CA,OR,WA,NV,IA,etc. --Haha169 (talk) 22:31, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

Motd/2011-03-07

Hallo Hekerui, wegen Copyright-Problemen habe ich die eingetragene Datei ausgetauscht. Allerdings kann ich nicht sämtliche möglichen Sprachversionen der Beschreibung auf Existenz prüfen und gegebenenfalls löschen. Gruß, --Pristurus (talk) 10:22, 6 March 2011 (UTC) Ok,erledigt via Forum-Nachfrage. Funktioniert bei dir eigentlich noch die automatische Eintragung der motd-Templates auf der Seite der jeweils ausgewählten Datei? Gruß, --Pristurus (talk) 13:34, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

Another No evidence PD

Please have a look @ Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mahasaraswati.jpg ...Captain......Tälk tö me.. 10:58, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Kriiishnapuram Palace

If you have a picture of the Buddha (10th century vintage) installed in the Buddha Mantapam in the palace precincts, can you please upload it on wikicommons and then post it in the above article. Is the Alappey Buddha that you have posted the same as in this palace? Thanks.--Nvvchar (talk) 10:27, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

Motd - thumbtime (nur zur Info)

Hallo Hekerui, thumbtime funktioniert bei Videos, allerdings nur am betreffenden Tag direkt auf der Hauptseite, nicht jedoch in der Vorschau nach Eintrag des Parameters. Gruß, --Pristurus 11:13, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

File:World_homosexuality_laws.svg

Commons:Deletion requests/File:World homosexuality laws.svg Damiens.rf 15:50, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Narayana Guru.jpg

...Captain......Tälk tö me.. 08:39, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

File:BrunetBoy.jpg

Commons:Deletion requests/File:BrunetBoy.jpg Túrelio (talk) 13:26, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Narayana_Guru.jpg

File deletion warning

File:Narayana_Guru.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

  ...Captain......Tälk tö me.. 08:38, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

OTRS cases

Hi Hekerui, please do not tag files which have already {{OTRS received}} tags like in this case. Thanks and kind regards, AFBorchert (talk) 05:27, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Hi. These files don't seem to be in order but have been included in Wikipedia pages since June. Isn't that problematic? No changes were made to them since June either - it doesn't look like there is a more than month-long discussion happening that attempts to resolve their copyright, or is it? Thanks Hekerui (talk) 08:32, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Hi Hekerui, we have a 30 day period for OTRS cases as it is not uncommon for these cases to take that long. One problem is the OTRS backlog, the other the time consuming exchange of emails with third parties who are not familiar with free licenses etc. For these processes it is helpful to see the actual uploads for some considerable time such that the copyright holders can see what a permission refers to. And these files are already tagged; the tags are {{OTRS pending}} (initially used by the uploader) and {{OTRS received}} (confirmation by an OTRS member that we have an open ticket for it). Whenever concerns arise, they should be addressed at COM:ON. But there is no need to double tag these files. Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 08:57, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Duration of copyright

Of course. Look at here (page 22, article 96). This is the Copyright and Related Rights Law adopted in 1998, and it was repealed in December 2004. So, in Serbia, the works of authors who died before 1954 (2004-50=1954) are in public domain. I know that Croatia had a similar law until 1999 (text in Croatian, article 81). mickit 08:38, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

I just found this (the law adopted in 1978). Article 82 says: Copyrights last for the life of the author and 50 years after his death, unless otherwise stated in the articles of this law (rough translation). mickit 09:07, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Joe_performing_at_Koko_Pop.jpg

File deletion warning

File:Joe_performing_at_Koko_Pop.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

 

Also: File:Joe_McElderry_performing_at_Koko_pop.jpg, File:Joe_McElderry_@_His_album_launch.jpg. Centralized it at en:Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_files/2011_July_15. --Martin H. (talk) 01:19, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Bollywood Hungama

I just retagged a few BH uploads with {{Cc-by-3.0-BollywoodHungama}}, replacing the generic tag, so they are now in the unreviewed cat. Also, we now have a significant amount of uploads from Filmitadka.com who have a similar CC-BY release for images their photographers take at parties, but that is being misinterpreted to include other images at parties, should we start a similar process for that source too? cheers. SpacemanSpiff (talk) 17:14, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

A question about copyright

Hi Hekerui,

Please see this file. Text in this file was written in Ninth century by some unknown person. However the present file is scannned copy of a 1959 edition.

1. Can we use this?
2. If not, can we use this by removing title page, prologue etc.?

With regards

--Vssun (talk) 15:19, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for explanation. I mentioned this at Village Pump too. Please have a look there also. I will ask the uploader to re-upload the same after removing Title, Prologue & Footnotes. --Vssun (talk) 12:28, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

Thank you

for marking File:Aoibhinn Ní Shúilleabháin.jpg as Copyvio.

Groetjes Neozoon (talk) 23:21, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Ray stu.gif

Hi! How do we know the photo was published before 1951? According to the article on en-wiki his first move was released in 1955. We could asume that he was not famous before that date and then wonder if it is likely that his photo was published before that date. Do you have info about that? --MGA73 (talk) 21:29, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Assessment

Hi,

I was assuming that a "Media of the day" was selected after a vote. This is not the case, as opposed to a "Picture of the day". I will stop to add the assessment header for this kind of media. I will correct my previous edits to correct that. Thank you for the comment.

Cantons-de-l'Est (talk) 23:13, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Gaga-monster-ball-uk-speechless.jpg

Hi! Hast du bei dem Bild unter der freien Lizenz das Vollbild gesehen, so wie man es jetzt in der quelle sieht? Wenn ja könnte man auch das Vollbild noch hochladen. mfg. --Itu (talk) 23:01, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi Itu, ja, ich hab es zu der Zeit am vollständigen Bild gesehen, aber jetzt ist die Lizenz dafür geändert worden und wir können das Bild nicht mehr hochladen - sich auf eine damalige Lizenz für ein Werk zu berufen, das so hier noch nicht hochgeladen war, von dem nur eine Ableitung legal existiert, und dem jetzt hinreichende Lizenzierung enzogen wurde, ist trotz des Nichtzurücknehmenkönnens problematisch. Wir haben es halt zu dem Zeitpunkt nicht getan, deshalb ist es jetzt zu spät. Beste Grüße Hekerui (talk) 20:42, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Ich sehe nichts was daran problematisch wäre. Das Bild kann vollständig hochgeladen werden. --Itu (talk) 19:31, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Help

Hi. I remember long time before we had some talks on commons. I need your help here. Recently I uploaded this image (1). It seems now there comes a new issue about the authors work. But I see clearly this image must have been taken by camera as per its high resolution size by the author. Need your suggestion. Thanks ----Ungal Vettu Pillai (talk) 06:23, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

I have contacted the author and waiting for some response and as per response I believe we can move forward. But Hekerui on what basis that account was black-listed (This will help me so that next time I can watch out for author's status. I would like to share this also: after my upload I did some research and found no where that image being downloaded from some sites or taken from else-where. So with that I believe it must have been his own work (only based on my research I say this) but still when there are some doubts it is better we go by rules. Thank you again. ----Ungal Vettu Pillai (talk) 21:16, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Dutch Kate Bush.jpg

File deletion warning

File:Dutch Kate Bush.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

  99.69.76.82 03:14, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

North Carolina map update

Would you mind updating North Carolina on this map as well. I'd do it myself, but I don't know how and don't have the time to figure it out at the moment. Bluepjs23 (talk) 17:18, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

File:SteveOda-2008-05-05-Toronto.jpg

File deletion warning

File:SteveOda-2008-05-05-Toronto.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

  Stefan4 (talk) 23:43, 16 May 2012 (UTC)