User talk:KTo288

我的中文板對話頁在這裡。要用中文對話時就可以用它。

Archives 03/10/06 - 31/10/08

Archives 03/11/08 - 31/10/09

Archives 11/09 - 09/10

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, KTo288!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki—it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel irc:wikimedia-commons #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], which produces: Image:Foo.jpg If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|correct name}} For more information read the full deletion guidelines.
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Question about derivative works

Hi. Does a convention goer at a comic book convention dressed up as a copyright-protected character like Batman Beyond constitute a derivative work? Thanks? Nightscream (talk) 09:31, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

In my opinion if its a really good costume, such that a picture of the cosplayer could be used to substitute for a picture from the copyright holders official pictures, then I would consider it a derivative work.KTo288 (talk) 23:13, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

So a photo of a cosplayer in a Batman Beyond costume would not be an appropriate addition to the BB article, as in, say, a section on that property's cultural influence? Nightscream (talk) 05:48, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

For me there would be two issues with such an image, one as a Commoner and one as a Wikipedian. I can't say without seeing the image but I have deleted pictures of cosplayers as derivative works, if I as a bit of a fanboy have to scratch my head and can't make out who the player is then I usually let them be. The other is as a wikipedian a derivative work as a copyvio has to be absolutely essential to be included, and not be added just because it would be nice to have a picture or that you have a picture available, and if its a low quality image or one in which the subject is ambiguous it really doesn't belong. To me an image to show cultural impact is not significant enough to add the image.KTo288 (talk) 09:26, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

When you mention not being able to make out who the player is, you mean which character they're supposed to be, right?

Also, you mentioned above that the quality of the costume is a criterion. When you said this, was this also part of being able to ID the character? I ask, because of the two players I snapped, the one of Batman Beyond is an excellent costume, though the other, of Optimus Prime, while highly impressive for its creativity (it involved attaching lots of found metal components to regular clothing), is clearly not a store-bought costume, as the Batman Beyond one appeared to be. Nightscream (talk) 14:09, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

The discussion at Commons:Deletion requests/Images of costumes tagged as copyvios by AnimeFan reflects Commons position on this at the moment. Not exactly in line with my own position, but people in costumes should be okay, here, whether such an image is welcome in the article is another matter. Thanks for bringing this up, as until I thought to look it up I thought the outcome of the DR would be to delete, strange that they would conclude that yes that such images are technically copyvios, but copyvios we can keep.--KTo288 (talk) 19:45, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

Category:Festivals_of_Bangalore

Category discussion notification

Category:Festivals_of_Bangalore has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

:| TelCoNaSpVe :| 05:35, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

Category:Studentenverbindungen in Hesse

Category deletion warning

Category:Studentenverbindungen in Hesse has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

   — Jeff G. ツ 16:40, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Statue_of_John_LeJeune_at_the_Museum_of_the_marine_Corps.jpg

File deletion warning

File:Statue_of_John_LeJeune_at_the_Museum_of_the_marine_Corps.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

  DrKiernan (talk) 09:16, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Category:United States Navy images by location

Category discussion notification

Category:United States Navy images by location has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

--– Adrignola talk 02:37, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

Moved incorrectly named category

Hello KTo288, I just did

Rename Category:East German T-54 tanks to Category:T-54 tanks in East German service (2 entries moved, 0 to go) East German T-54 tanks;T-54 tanks in East German service;r;

and

Rename Category:East German T-55A tanks to Category:T-55A tanks in East German service (9 entries moved, 0 to go) East German T-55A tanks;T-55A tanks in East German service;r;

as to comply with commons naming rules and the naming in its contained subcategories.

Thanks and greetings. --High Contrast (talk) 17:17, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

No problem. Thanks.--KTo288 (talk) 22:43, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Help?!

Hey, sorry! I have question!

If i edit not my work and send this work to the commons , it's not may work?

Beacuse if it not my work, then someone must delete this :(:

• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5

sorry :( --Muffi (talk) 23:24, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

No problem, have a look at the sections above this one, we all make mistakes, live and learn and make good the mistakes we've made. Okay so as I understand it, you took pictures of which you were not the original author, you edited/modified these images in some way and then uploaded them to Commons. In such a case you have created a derivative work and unless the original author gave you permission or the orginal file was licensed in such a way as to allow you to do so such files cannot be kept here, and since you raised it I guess you do not have such permissions. Give me a moment to look through them and I'll sort it out.--KTo288 (talk) 23:46, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Sorted but not by me, spent too much time.--KTo288 (talk) 23:50, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Category:United_States_Army_National_Guard

Category discussion notification

Category:United_States_Army_National_Guard has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 17:17, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

Delete vote mistaken

You voted to delete at [[1]] based on the Wikipedia deletion, but that deletion was for reason "F8 - identical image on Commons". So there's no copyright or other reason that was accepted for that deletion. Wnt (talk) 17:35, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for your correction.--KTo288 (talk) 12:46, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

"No FOP in France"

Bonjour KTo288,

Je viens de supprimer une de tes photos qui représent un bâtiment récent (un édicule Guimard). Il n'y a en effet pas de liberté de panorama en France, et même si c'est bien dommage, Commons se doit de respecter cette interdiction.

Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 10:52, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

Je comprends. Je connais mieux.--KTo288 (talk) 13:58, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

re:File:1 yuang 1893-1976.jpg

{{es|Sí. Ya lo sé. Yo lo marqué como copyright. Cometí el error de subirlo, pero me di cuenta mientras lo hacía. Gracias. --. HombreDHojalata.^talk 21:26, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

You're welcome.--KTo288 (talk) 21:29, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Coins in a Shell.001 - Tower of London.JPG

I understand copyright reasons, but I hadn't time to review the picture before the delection xDDDD --37.11.176.130 13:16, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

I did it as a speedy, if you want to do it through a regular deletion review, I can undelete it and put it to the community.--KTo288 (talk) 13:29, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

No, no, it's Ok. I saw in my mail the warning, and when I went to the link, the photo was deteted. If that photo have problems of copyright (because of coins of London Tower), I understand and accept the delection. --Drow male (talk) 16:44, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for your understanding, my apologies if my actions seem arbitary.--KTo288 (talk) 20:05, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

DR closure

I have created an AN/U for your wrongful closure of that DR. Fry1989 ^eh? 19:44, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

It was your perogative to do so. I'll reply to you here, since that thread has been closed, DRs are for the discussion of files with copyright and policy problems, this file had neither, in my opinon the DR was the wrong venue for this dispute.--KTo288 (talk) 07:45, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

DRs are for requesting deletion. For whatever reason. Very heavy-handed to use of admin buttons. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 09:26, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for your words of sdvice Pieter, I will reflect upon them.--10:10, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Heartfelt thanks

Dear KTo288,
My heartfelt thanks to you for the ‘Barnstar’ that you awarded me! It encouraged me a lot, and shows that I am on the right way. If you have any suggestions or Instructions, please let me know. I always try to do my job and act in real life sincerely! -- Biswarup Ganguly (talk) 04:03, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

No instructions, just continue to do as you have been doing, you're doing a very good job, just don't be disheartened when some images need to be deleted because of Freedom of Panorama concerns.--KTo288 (talk) 09:53, 20 May 2012 (UTC)