User talk:Mattbuck

ATTENTION: Please use this talk page rather than emailing me. I will also most likely reply here rather than on your talk page.

Archives October 2007 - June 2008 June 2008 - August 2008 August 2008 - December 2008 December 2008 - April 2010 April 2010 - September 2010 September 2010 - May 2011 May 2011 - December 2011 January 2012 - March 2012 Current

Month Year in City

Nonsense. Leeds and Salford already have images by month and the overall volume by city is certainly there to justify very many others of this ilk. Ardfern (talk) 15:43, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Question about deliberate use of bad faith barnstar?

This appears to be deliberate use of the "Wikilove" function for a bad faith barnstar. Can something be done about this? It seems to violate our Commons project principles of COM:MELLOW, yes? I could use your advice here, -- Cirt (talk) 20:22, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

• You can always remove it, Cirt. I'm surprised that you saw through my scheme--I guess I should give you more credit next time. Oh, "bad faith" should probably not be italicized; use quotes. Cheers, Drmies (talk) 21:48, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
  • Mattbuck, this is clearly inappropriate behavior, yes? I think something should be done about this. -- Cirt (talk) 22:47, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

    I would concur, but I am now an involved admin and so can't do anything about it. -mattbuck (Talk) 23:11, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

    Oh I wasn't asking for you to do something, but thanks. :) Just advice about where to take this. I'll inquire with the closing admin. -- Cirt (talk) 23:17, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Update: Please see Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#Drmies_.3D_use_of_bad_faith_barnstar_via_WikiLove_function. -- Cirt (talk) 02:52, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Oldfield_Park_railway_station_MMB_08_158958.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:St_Philips_Marsh_TRSMD_MMB_03_153382_43183.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments QI for me--Lmbuga 19:46, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Paddington_railway_station_MMB_01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Good quality. --S nova 17:01, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Caledonian Road and Barnsbury railway station MMB 07.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Somewhat grayish capture but maybe I should blame the weather. The quality is quite good nevertheless. --Ximonic 10:35, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Tamworth_railway_station_MMB_01_170107.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:26, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Birmingham_New_Street_railway_station_MMB_15_221133.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments a bit too dark? But QI is it. --Ralf Roletschek 12:26, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Pilning_railway_station_MMB_04_158767.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Good quality. --Yann 12:33, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Bristol Parkway railway station MMB 18 220022.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Good quality. --Yann 12:10, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

A women's vulva

Can you please move File:A_women's_vulva.jpg to File:A_woman's_vulva.jpg? They're duplicates of each other. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 23:21, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 23:49, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Responses on en:WP

FYI, there were several responses to your post on en:WP: [1]. --JN466 20:47, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Please check this addition for correctness

Hallo Mattbuck, please check this addition for correctness (my source is not authenticated). Thanks. --Saibo (Δ∇) 21:52, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

your barnstar

Hi, I consider this barnstar a personal attack on a named editor. The fact that this editor is blocked and cannot respond makes the situation worse. May I please ask you consider changing of the wording in your wikilove message? Thanks. Oh, yes, the turtles image was taken by me, so thanks for commenting on it.--Mbz1 (talk) 19:55, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

FYE

Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#User:Mattbuck --Wladyslaw (talk) 22:11, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

Good grief: that's not going to be the last one of those, I'm afraid. You've long been one of the good guys in my book (tough but fair, dedicated but level-headed), but I think you've been orbiting awfully close to the drama-black-hole event horizon lately. FWIW, YMMV, etc. --SB_Johnny ^talk 00:05, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Concerning one of your blocks

I forgot to let you know earlier, but I've started a discussion about Saibo's block: Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#Unblock. I'm proposing for Saibo to be unblocked. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 21:32, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality images

Bonjour. J'ai remarqué que vous posté quelque chose comme 20 images à la page Qualité Images aujourd'hui. Bien qu'il n'y ait pas de règle explicite contre cela, il est généralement considéré comme une mauvaise forme pour ajouter plus de 4 ou 5 en une seule journée. Merci. -mattbuck (Talk) 13:06, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Vous pouvez également envisager d'archiver cette page, car il est assez long. S'il vous plaît voir Commons:Bien utiliser les pages de discussion.. -mattbuck (Talk) 13:09, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Bonjour, suite à ta remarque, je viens de supprimer des images. Bonne fin de journée. --Thesupermat (talk) 13:35, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Kuhmar sdd 9396.jpg

Where is this overexposed? Thanks.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 18:33, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

The sky is white, grass is too bright. Even if it weren't, I wouldn't promote as there are awful JPEG artifacts, especially in the trees. -mattbuck (Talk) 18:41, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. It was 95% JPEG or 94% JPEG quality -- about uncompressed... Too strange to hear about JPEG artifacts...--PereslavlFoto (talk) 19:17, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Your comment helped me to reproduce the image from raw file. Could you please check it and share your opinion with me? Thank you.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 07:21, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

New version is better, but still not QI to me. Same problems actually. Not as severe, but still there. -mattbuck (Talk) 09:51, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Paddington railway station MMB 12 332014 332006 43XXX.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 17:04, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Tondu railway station MMB 04.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 19:12, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Stapleton_Rd_Stn_4.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Nice composition and OK for QI. --NorbertNagel 18:17, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Flax Bourton railway station MMB 27 150281.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Good quality. --Yann 12:10, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Image rename

Thanks, and sorry about the ".jpg". --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 15:30, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Nibley Lane, Yate MMB 05.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 18:09, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Birmingham International railway station MMB 03 390035.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:50, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Mass deletion of Sridhar Babu Peram's files

Although many of his (the various socks) files were copyright violations, not all were violations. The Kabandha's image was a PD-India|PD-art as artist Balasaheb Pant Pratinidhi died in 1951. A case to case basis decision should be taken instead of a mass deletion. Please revert the deletion. --Redtigerxyz (talk) 17:37, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Could you give me a link to the specific file? -mattbuck (Talk) 18:01, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

File:The Picture Ramayana 1.jpg or File:The Picture Ramayana 2.jpg. Other files also need to be scrutinized. --Redtigerxyz (talk) 18:03, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Undeleted. -mattbuck (Talk) 18:08, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

There were many other useful (PD-India/PD-art) images uploaded by Sridhar Babu Peram. Can undelete all and go by case to case basis on deletion? He planted many of his images of Hinduism-related articles of English wikipedia and many articles are suffering red links. Some of them: The_forces_of_Visvamitra_and_those_raised_by_Vasistha's_volition_battle_for_possession_of_Sabala.jpg, File:Hanuman vanquishes Nikumbha by wrenching off his head.jpg etc. --Redtigerxyz (talk) 18:16, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Done. Please take any other requests to COM:UDEL. -mattbuck (Talk) 10:30, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#Revert_mass_deletion_of_Sridhar_Babu_Peram.27s_files--Redtigerxyz (talk) 11:58, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Beeston railway station MMB 12 222019.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Good. --Iifar 07:29, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Nailsea and Backwell railway station MMB 41 150239 153380.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Good quality. --Yann 10:55, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Stratford International railway station MMB 10 395017.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments I like such reduced colors and sharpness. --Ralf Roletschek 17:08, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Watford Junction railway station MMB 17 321415.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 17:59, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Beeston railway station MMB 17 156415.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 18:31, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Jubilee Campus MMB 29 Sir Colin Campbell Building.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Leytonstone High Road railway station MMB 04 150130.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Good -- MJJR 20:08, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Bristol Temple Meads railway station MMB 77 43149.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 18:49, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Jubilee Campus MMB F7 Atrium.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 16:51, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Homo en USA.pdf

Why do you add that sexuality cat to a DR that has nothing to do with sexuality? Being about sexuality is not a valid reason for keep or delete in this case. That fact that it is about sexuality doesn't make the file in scope or not and it doesn't create or block permission. I want to assume good faith, but the way you use the cat in this DR is quite strange. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:22, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

You seem to misunderstand the idea of the category. It is not to watch deletion requests based on sexuality or nudity reasons, it's to watch deletion requests of media relating to nudity or human sexuality, no matter what the rationale. The PDF description mentions homosexuality in the US, so I assumed it is about sexuality and add the category. -mattbuck (Talk) 10:27, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Re: File:Jubilee Campus MMB C8 Melton Hall and Business School North.jpg

Hi, I was just wondering what you find unusual about this image, other than it's not of a train? -mattbuck (Talk) 10:25, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Hi, No, I did not think about trains. I thought about the light, the perspective, the night, the lamp, the snow... All the mood I like very much. I think this kind of pictures is "refreshing" the usual way of "Commons", so it is to me "unusual" (but maybe it is not the good english word, sorry...). Well, I congratulate you for this image.--Jebulon (talk) 11:59, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Thirsk railway station MMB 05.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 18:41, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Euston railway station MMB 12 378229.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 16:23, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Jubilee Campus MMB C8 Melton Hall and Business School North.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Very interesting. I've suggested a crop at left.--Jebulon 17:01, 1 May 2012 (UTC) Duly cropped. Mattbuck 01:28, 4 May 2012 (UTC)Much better, IMO. Thanks for this unusual picture.--Jebulon 01:25, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Minehead railway station MMB 04 9351.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 07:14, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Bristol Temple Meads railway station MMB 43 220003.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:32, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Farringdon railway station MMB 07.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Good quality, nice view --Taxiarchos228 15:43, 8 May 2012 (UTC) yes, very good! --Ralf Roletschek 15:49, 8 May 2012 (UTC) The train spotters love it. -- MJJR 21:13, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Kentish Town railway station MMB 09.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments where is the station? ;) --Ralf Roletschek 17:50, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Wye Valley Junction MMB 06.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Good picture. --Florstein 14:21, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Burton-on-Trent railway station MMB 05 220029.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 19:47, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Flax Bourton railway station MMB 22 220XXX.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Nice view. - A.Savin 23:29, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Jubilee Campus MMB 80 Computer Science.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Good, despite some noise. - A.Savin 23:24, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Watford Junction railway station MMB 23 390025.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Good quality. --Iifar 17:58, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Tondu railway station MMB 06.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments QI for me. JLPC 19:09, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Comedor de la Universidad Técnica de Múnich para estudios mediáticos, Riesstr. 44, Múnich, Alemania 2012-04-28, DD 03.JPG

Hello, I worked the picture although you marked it with a red frame. The version I just uploaded is for sure better (easy to do with RAW and PS5.5), but I am not confident if it is good enough. Please, let me know what you think. Thanks and regards, Poco a poco (talk) 20:28, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Much better. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:21, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the quick reaction! Will try to follow this path. Poco a poco (talk) 22:10, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Yatton railway station MMB 20.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 07:40, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Birmingham International railway station MMB 04 390035.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 15:44, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Euston Square station MMB 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 15:44, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Watford Junction railway station MMB 27 378210.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 10:36, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Oxford railway station MMB 05 165133.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 10:36, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Reading railway station MMB 08 165116.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 14:11, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Tal-y-Cafn railway station MMB 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments QI for me.--JLPC 21:23, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Alexandra Palace railway station MMB 06 365521.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 14:11, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Radcliffe railway station MMB 10 156413.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Fine! DimiTalen 07:42, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Bedford railway station MMB 15 319365 319385.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Good. DimiTalen 07:42, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Nottingham railway station MMB 21 156414.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Good. -- JLPC 15:54, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Parson Street railway station MMB 21 150247.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 20:32, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Langstone Rock MMB 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Nice composition, i think the quality is good enough for QI.--ArildV 09:58, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Bedford railway station MMB 05 222022.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Gauravjuvekar 08:37, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Yatton railway station MMB 22 220021.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:12, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

Picture of Vojtech Sedlacek

How may I prove the autorship of the picture? I am the worker in Vojtech Sedlacek's company. He sent me his own photo he made and told me to put it to the bio article about him on Wiki.

We have a problem. The oldest photo of Vojtech, uploaded by me in Dec 2008 is always side distorted in the Biography page. That's why I started to experiment with the picture. Can this be solved, please?

I just tend to be suspicious when I see such images, as they're mostly culled from company websites without permission. I'm happy to accept what you say as true, though it would be best if you could forward your original correspondence to our OTRS team. -mattbuck (Talk) 20:10, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

File:BSicon exCONT3.svg

File deletion warning

File:BSicon exCONT3.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

  -Nard (Hablemonos)(Let's talk) 02:30, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Some people have too much time and imagination and not enough common sense… Useddenim (talk) 10:38, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Bedminster railway station MMB 16.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Yes.--Jebulon 09:59, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Much Dewchurch field MMB 03.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Yatton railway station MMB 17 150267.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 14:31, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Hornsey railway station MMB 22 321418 365505.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Very good. --Keymeulen 15:13, 20 May 2012 (UTC)