User talk:Techman224

Archives 1

TUSC token 71be8a0eda1a1ace655e0daef45d4660

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Nicole Faria

Hello, Techman224. You have new messages at Fanofbollywood's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Česky | Deutsch | English | Español | Suomi | Français | हिन्दी | Italiano | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Português | Română | Русский | Svenska | +/−

My pictures,

Excuse me. My picture BIBUD.png, is totally allowed to be posted on Wikipedia, look:

" Private use of the images created on SP-Studio.de is allowed. You can print them, use them for single T-Shirt, wallpapers or birthday card. School projects are fine too. But remember this: Always mention where those images come from! For example if you show SP-Studio pictures on your private homepage, Facebook, Blog or in a message board add a link to www.sp-studio.de. It doesn't matter if you add it to the picture or mention it elsewhere. You are allowed to use them for videos or comics too, as long as you give me credit. Avatars and small images do not need a link." - http://www.sp-studio.de/help.htm

Please, do not delete it.

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:DennysOMarshall

If/when you have a minute

Could you take a look at this filter. Having found a few IPs placing spammy links recently I thought it would be good to get an idea about the scale of the problem however currently the filter is firing when an IP puts a cat on a file (I think) which is obviously wrong). Any assistance will be appreciated - TIA --Herby ^{talk thyme} 10:32, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

I've examined the log entries, and for all of them where the category changes the filter doesn't return a match which it should do, for the one by 117.193.118.30 and others where a link is changed or added it returns positive as it should. I don't know what the abuse filter was doing those days, but when manually examining the edits and loading the filter as it is now, it returns false. I would enable it again to see if it gives false positives. I think it's a glitch of some kind. Techman224^Talk 23:42, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

OK - running again and thanks for the help. --Herby ^{talk thyme} 12:57, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Commons:Bots/Requests/TechBot 2

If you still want to pursue the bot request, there are a couple of questions waiting for you. --99of9 (talk) 01:32, 22 May 2012 (UTC)