User talk:Yann
You can leave me a message in English or French, at the bottom. Click on the + above. Yann 22:13, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
/archives /archives_1 /archives_2 /archives_3 /archives 4 /archives 5 /archives 6 /archives 7 /archives 8 /archives 9 /archives 10 /archives 11 /archives 12 /archives 13
[edit] Tip: Categorizing images
Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца) | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk (bokmål) | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Српски / Srpski | Svenska | தமிழ் | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(繁體) | +/−
Hello, Yann!
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
- [[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
- [[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
- [[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.
CategorizationBot (talk) 14:12, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
- Image:US-Federal-Reserve-Note-Series-1934-1-B-Cleveland-Ohio.jpg was uncategorized on 3 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:12, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
- Image:500-Million-Dollar-Series-1934-Federal-Reserve-System-Inventory-List-for-Bond-numbers-D-45183601-A.jpg was uncategorized on 3 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:12, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
- Image:500-Million-Dollar-Series-1934-Federal-Reserve-Note-Cleveland-Ohio-Coupon-Bond-D-45183601-A-Obver.jpg was uncategorized on 3 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:12, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
- Image:500-Million-Dollar-Series-1934-Federal-Reserve-System-Federal-Reserve-Certificate-for-Bond-numbers.jpg was uncategorized on 3 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:12, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
[edit] Crafts Museum text
Dear Yann, I am grateful for the wonderful photos you clicked of the Crafts Museum. I hope to see more in the future. We are still in the process of filing an OTRS ticket but here is the possible text you could use: "This image is a part of the GLAM collaboration between the Crafts Museum, New Delhi and Wikimedia community in India. Under this collaboration the Crafts Museum, New Delhi has permitted photography and release of its images under CC-BY-SA 3.0 and/or other free licenses in the public domain." Merci beaucoup, Yann :) A bientot! Noopur28 (talk) 11:24, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
[edit] Combat de cornes dans les coins
- Salut.
- Merci pour tes récents supports de mes images.
- Félicitations pour ta série indienne en QIC, passionnante et bien jolie.
- Chapeau surtout pour ton combat
de bœufsd' antilopes, que j'ai soutenu en FPC. However, comme y disent, il y a un petit problème à régler. En redressant ton image, tu as laissé un petit "blanc" bien visible dans le coin en haut à gauche, qui nuit à la perfection de l'ensemble. Un léger clonage, ou un "crop", devrait y remédier. - Enfin bref, tu sais ce que tu as à faire.
- Amitiés,--Jebulon (talk) 14:07, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
- Merci, tu as l'œil ! Mais ce ne sont pas des bœufs, mais des antilopes, tss, tss ! ;o) Yann (talk) 15:06, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
- Allons bon, j'ai l'air malin !! Dis donc, c'est chaud, chez les antilopes ! Bref, y'a quand même du blanc...--Jebulon (talk) 15:36, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
- Merci, tu as l'œil ! Mais ce ne sont pas des bœufs, mais des antilopes, tss, tss ! ;o) Yann (talk) 15:06, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks
Thanks. I love your images.--Miguel Bugallo 22:04, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
[edit] Scope changed for Morgan Pressel photograph
Scope changed from Morgan Pressel (Portrait) to Morgan Pressel at Pro-Am tournament --Yjenith (talk) 09:23, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
- Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".
[edit] Commons:Valued_image_candidates/Morgan_Pressel_-_Flickr_-_Keith_Allison_(26).jpg scope changed for your review
Scope changed from Morgan Pressel tee shot to Morgan Pressel --Yjenith (talk) 16:26, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
- Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".
[edit] Bougainvillea
Both these files would benefit froma levels adjust. I tried it and the colourful tree really popped out. Just a thought, nice work on this and the Taj. Saffron Blaze (talk) 22:03, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
[edit] You have an email.
Please read your emails, Thanks, --Alchemist-hp (talk) 23:54, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
[edit] Review?
Hello, cxan you please give a review at my talk page? Thanks. Dipankan001 (talk) 05:14, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
[edit] Cervus elaphus (réponse)
Un gran merci ;) --Luc Viatour (talk) 13:36, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
[edit] Distortion
Hello Yann, you promoted this painting and at the same time suggested to improve the distortion. I have uploaded a new version with the target to fix that problem, please, have a look and let me know. Thanks for everything and happy Eastern! --Poco a poco (talk) 06:56, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
[edit] Jaune, et Jaune
Salut Yann,
- Pardon d'avoir pris tant de temps à te répondre.
- Saint-Eustache: il s'agit d'une lumière parfaitement naturelle, due au soleil couchant d'hiver. cette photo est particulièrement remarquable du fait que la pierre prend dans ces conditions un teinte superbe, rare, et à vrai dire seulement perceptible en automne ou en hiver. J'ai ainsi eu la chance de pouvoir saisir Saint-Louis des Invalides presque rose, et je peux te garantir que ça n'a duré que quelques minutes à peine. Autre exemple, la coupole de Saint-Augustin, qui est bien plus triste à d'autres heures de la journée. J'ai donc souhaité promouvoir la photo de Moonik pour cette qualité-là, avoir su saisir une lumière inhabituelle (mais naturelle) au bon moment (souvent très court).
- Le sarcophage d'enfant: je commence à connaître la question, nombre de mes photos récentes de la crypte des Habsbourg à Vienne ayant été passées au crible du filtre QI. Ici, nous sommes en présence d'un sarcophage d'enfant en albâtre, donc blanc, par simple éthymologie. Un réglage préalable de l'appareil photo aurait permis de corriger (ou au moins d'atténuer) ce que la lumière (ici artificielle) avait de jaunasse, sans compter un léger travail de désaturation des jaunes, et peut être de renforcement des bleus, à l'aide de logiciels de post traitement, le cas échéant. J'ajoute que d'autres ont parfaitement réussi, sur le même objet, à éviter cet écueil, (même si la photo n'est pas bonne globalement). L'argument du "flash" ne tient évidemment pas, et sent le combat d'arrière-garde...
- Ma conclusion, c'est que nous avons d'un côté une volonté délibérée d'obtenir un effet inhabituel et "beau", en lumière naturelle, et de l'autre, un cliché pris rapidement, sans le soin préalable qu'exige une telle prise de vue en environnement difficile, avec donc des défauts "subis" et non gérés.
- J'espère que mes explications t'auront satisfait, ou au moins fait comprendre ma position.
- Par ailleurs, je suis vraiment désolé pour ta belle princesse en sari bleu, mais vraiment, ce trait sombre le long de sa jolie silhouette me paraît rédhibitoire. N'y vois bien sûr aucune animosité particulière, j'essaie d'être sincère. C'est difficile, tant on voit d'assez vilaines (ou en tous cas médiocres) choses promues par conformisme, cette dernière remarque ne concernant à l'évidence ni tes images, ni tes jugements, qui me sont si souvent et si gentiment favorables !
- Bien cordialement à toi,
- --Jebulon (talk) 14:19, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
[edit] Issue fixed on Commons Archive
Hi Yann, just wanted to let you know I fixed the issue that was preventing your additional SR2 uploads on Commons Archive (in the end I just disabled TIFFHandler, which is not fond of almost-TIFF formats like SR2). Please feel free to upload a few more files - I've been uploading some more NEFs. I also moved from S3 storage to EBS storage and did other performance tuning, which should make it much more responsive. Dcoetzee (talk) 17:34, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
[edit] Reply if you can
You have one reply in Commons:Valued image candidates/George Maharis 1975.jpg. Please respond if you can. --George Ho (talk) 06:53, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
- Oh, wait... Can you change your rationale and vote? I have changed the scoop. --George Ho (talk) 11:30, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
[edit] Images from Digitalt Museum, Norway
You have tagged one of my uploads with missing permission. The file has a link to the source, where the license is stated (cc-by-sa-3.0). The museum has a page where they inform more about licensing, see [1]. I have removed the missing permission-tag, but if you think there still are some problems with the image, I suggest you nominate it for deletion (which would affect most of the images in Category:Media from the collection of Oslo Museum and Category:Images from Digitalt Museum, Norway). Best regards - 4ing (talk) 13:59, 26 April 2012 (UTC).
 |
Hello, Yann. You have new messages on Commons:Batch uploading/Works of Maurice Ravel. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Česky | Deutsch | English | Español | Suomi | Français | हिन्दी | Italiano | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Português | Română | Русский | Svenska | +/− |
[edit] FP candidate File:Durga, Burdwan, 2011.JPG
Does this FP candidate Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Durga, Burdwan, 2011.JPG violates copyright on commons? Please see discussion on its nomination page. There are so many images of durga idol there in commons for many years. This is a QI and VI. I am asking you because you have supported the image for FP. You also supported the image for becoming QI and you are an administrator on commons. What is your thought about this? Thanks in advance. -- Joydeep (talk) 16:02, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
[edit] camera quality
Hi Yann, thanks for the feedback re the bracelet. That particular image was heavily cropped, in poor light (indoors in a museum that didn't allow flash) and without using the tripod. File:Vani belt (inside view of stag).JPG is a photo taken with the same camera in the same lighting but uncropped, and File:Lady with Pearl.JPG is an uncropped photo taken outdoors with the same camera - probably with the tripod. Do you think it would be technically possible to take a quality image with that camera? Jonathan Cardy (talk) 16:40, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
- I think it is difficult. Images from cheap cameras have a lot of noise, and are not sharp. There are suitable for Web uses, but the quality is too low for QI. You can still get valued images with your camera as the quality standard is much lower. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:45, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
[edit] Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Eiffel tower and the seine at night.jpg
Hi Yann. Can you tell me what you mean by "no copyright on ordinary light"? I can't understand this phrasing. Tomer T (talk) 20:04, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
- There can't be a copyright on simple lightning. See Platonides' comment. Plus in this case, it is a general view, which means that an unavoidable copyrighted element in a larger view is allowed. The Place des Terreaux court case: Commons:De minimis#An example under Civil Law, [2]. Regards, Yann (talk) 04:06, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File source is not properly indicated
Hi, the following 2 files were flagged stating its missing its source. I am confused as in the source I put Own work as I took both of these photographs myself.
File source is not properly indicated: File:CF Firefight.jpg
File source is not properly indicated: File:MP Patrol SUV (Chevrolet Tahoe).jpg
Please advise, thanks. DarkKomodo (talk) 05:16, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Yann, I wrote back to your response on my board, please see there. Thanks DarkKomodo (talk) 18:26, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
[edit] Onions
Pehaps you too can help here: User talk:Alchemist-hp#Onions. Thanks in advance. Colin (talk) 08:21, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
[edit] copyright of my pictures
Hi! I'm very confused about all the messages I have just read. I haven't noticed all these copyright infringment before today, and I'm sorry about that. I have uploaded several files since a few days, and I had never seen any message. These pictures are the property of the company in which I currently work. What should I change in the pictures' description to fix this problem?
Nightmare31 (talk) 14:00, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Bonjour, je constate que je n'ai toujours pas eu de réponse. Je ne veux pas paraître désagréable ou pressé, mais j'aimerais pouvoir rajouter les photos sur mes articles avant de me pencher sur d'autres travaux.
Bonne continuation ! Nightmare31 (talk) 12:49, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
[edit] creative commons
I am trying to find someone who would be online right now. Would this be a acceptable Creative Commons licensing. Jhenderson777 (talk) 15:22, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
[edit] Civil or not - that is the question
Please clarify what here is not civil. Is it civil to knock s.o. because he posts anonymous? Your revert is nothing else than censorship. Think about it and have a nice evening. --84.174.246.61 19:42, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Taj Mahal, Agra, India edit2.jpg
Yann, we received an OTRS email about this image. Apparently someone else has submitted it to a Qatar Airways contest as their own work although you have licensed the image as CC-BY-SA. The submission is at [3]. cheers. —SpacemanSpiff 11:01, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
- The email only informed us that the sender found the image on this link as a user submission. Apparently, Qatar airways gains copyright of all user submissions. Sender informed us that he sent a message to Qatar Airways saying that the image is not from the uploader, but rather one from a Wikipedia editor. I've informed the sender about this conversation. If you wish I can ask the sender to contact you directly using the "E-mail this user" function, but I'm not sure that the sender knows anything more either, he just happened to see it and recognized the image as one used on Wikipedia. cheers. —SpacemanSpiff 17:06, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
[edit] 小倉優子.jpg
Hi, I opened Commons:Deletion requests/File:小倉優子.jpg; in retrospect, I probably should have speedied it as a copyvio; I'm not sure it would be appropriate for me to do that now, since I've already opened it as a deletion request. Since I see you've previously commented to the user about copyvios, I thought I'd bring it to your attention. TJRC (talk) 20:58, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, you could have speedied it as copyvio. It does not matter now, as I deleted it. Regards, Yann (talk) 21:04, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
[edit] The Sinopskiy Battle on the 18th November of the 1853 year (Night after Battle)
Scope changed and description updated. Best regards. Angelus(talk) 22:14, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Peacock.jpg
A while back (almost a year!) you closed a deletion discussion on this picture and reverted to an older version. Something however seems to have been messed up with the licensing info and I can't figure out what actually happened at the time. Can you take a look? Thx. --Harthacnut (talk) 20:00, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
[edit] Permision Hosman
It is my work, look the svg version.Asybaris01 (talk) 20:37, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
[edit] Merci !
Merci ! Je suis très touché par tes félicitations. Je n'ai pas du tout la prétention de faire aussi bien que certains contributeurs qui sont mieux équipés et bien plus talentueux que moi pour ce genre de chose. Cordialement. --M0tty (talk) 21:13, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Card puncher - NARA - 513295.jpg date
Hello. Why did you caption File:Card puncher - NARA - 513295.jpg as "circa 1890? Please comment at File talk:Card puncher - NARA - 513295.jpg. Thank you much. Cheers, -- Infrogmation (talk) 21:28, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Klara Hitler.jpg
Hi! I wanted to inform you that a user continues to load a file version that is clearly overexposed! The face is disproportionately white and the whole image loses definition. I tried to warn the user not to overwrite the image, but the user continues to load the image edited, despite warnings. Thanks a lot and best regards. --Angelus(talk) 08:28, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
[edit] Copyright
Bonjour Yann. J'ai envoyé un mail à OTRS il y a un peu plus d'une semaine, concernant les images que j'avais posté sur différents articles. Je n'ai pas encore eu de retour. Je ne sais pas si je dois m'adresser à toi ou bien à une autre personne, mais j'attends depuis plusieurs jours que mes images soient acceptées.
--Nightmare31 (talk) 12:33, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
- Je n'ai pas acces a OTRS. Desole, Yann (talk) 13:44, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
- Merci quand même. Bonne continuation.
--Nightmare31 (talk) 10:59, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
[edit] Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Diego de Alvear, portrait .
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Oppose I think the technical quality for this image is not enough. The color is oversaturated and the image as a whole is too dark. His hair almost fades into the background, his shoulders do fade into the background, there is no way to see his arms against his torso, and the lapel is just a big bright red blob. 
Support With the reversion, this image is now the best in scope. [edit] Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
VMZ-5298 trolleybuses .
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
[edit] ":" and French
Hi Yann. Is it true that there should be always a (non-breaking) space before ":", in French (like Template:fr for instance)? Cheers. --Angelus(talk) 11:26, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
[edit] Taj Mahal
Hi, I will be going to Agra soon. Can you pleas let me know what time this was taken? --Muhammad (talk) 18:13, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
